Comments on: 2010 .::. A Social Odyssey

By: Jacob McNulty

Jacob McNulty — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 04:17:23 +0000

Thanks for reading and for your feedback – I hope we continue to provide interesting content for you.

By: Tim

Tim — Thu, 28 Oct 2010 02:23:52 +0000

This is my second time i visit here. I discovered so many fascinating stuff in your pages especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I assume I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Sustain the good work.

By: Jacob McNulty

Jacob McNulty — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:28:56 +0000

Thanks Dov – not sure what else to say here…

By: Dov Henis

Dov Henis — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:06:35 +0000

The factual relationship between gravity, cosmic evolution and life:

Again: Dark Energy And Dark Matter YOK

A. From “Ancient dawn’s early light refines age of universe
Satellite images reveal new aspects of Big Bang’s relic radiation.”
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/55957/title/Ancient_dawns_early_light_refines_age_of_universe

- “The ancient light, known as the cosmic microwave background, is peppered with hot and cold spots, signs of the tiny primordial lumps from which galaxies grew”, And “(It is suggested) that theorists will have to revise their understanding of galaxy clusters”.

- The “universal composition” mantra is displayed, again, as 4.5% ordinary matter, 22.7% dark matter and 72.8% dark energy.

B. From “No Dark Matter, No Maybe”
http://www.the-scientist.com/community/posts/list/240/122.page#4545

- Enough is enough. Humanity has been hallucinating about dark energy and dark matter for circa 100 years.

- The “tiny primordial lumps” grew NOT into galaxies, but into galaxy clusters.

- “Galaxy Clusters Evolved By Dispersion, Not By Conglomeration”.

- “There’s No Dark Energy Nor Dark Matter”. All the initial singularity energy and matter is still there in space-distance, accounted for by E=Total[m(1 + D)] .

C. And “Cosmic Evolution Simplified” accounts for the origin and nature of evolutionary biology via the cosmic gravity monotheism.

Dov Henis
(Comments From The 22nd Century)

By: Jacob McNulty

Jacob McNulty — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 06:03:09 +0000

Thanks for the note and the link Sean – I can’t turn down a research opportunity – I’d love to see your demo. I’ll send you an email to the address you entered…

By: Sean

Sean — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 01:56:48 +0000

Interesting take. I like the point you make at the end about the Hubble. That is the second time I’ve heard an astronomy metaphor for social network analysis lately.

There are some real challenges for those of us doing this work. The interfaces are still far from mature, and the use cases are not yet clear. It’s hard to market and there’s no de factor metaphor.

But you are right.

Shameless self-promotion warning: my company is working to build an “easy for what it is” tool for social network analysis.

You can see how we worked with a lobby that does work in the independent sector here http://jutenetworks.com/2010/01/independent-sector-a-quick-case-study/

I’m happy to do a demo for you, if you’re interested.

–Sean